The San Antonio Spurs can beat the Dallas Mavericks in this series if Gregg Popovich allows it. Dirk Nowitzki was unstoppable Sunday night because he matched 12 of 14 shooting from the floor with 12 of 12 from the free throw line. Gregg Popovich employed a strategy he learned from his good friend, Don Nelson, who drafted Dirk. He sent Erik Dampier to the line instead.
The hack-a-whoever strategy has worked before. The Spurs used it on Shaquille O'Neal in 2007 and Nellie's Mavs used it on Bruce Bowen in 2003, but sending Dampier to the line is the biggest mistake of Gregg Popovich's career for several reasons. Pop needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in The San Antonio Spurs can beat the Dallas Mavericks in this series if Gregg Popovich allows it. Dirk Nowitzki was unstoppable Sunday night because he matched 12 of 14 shooting from the floor with 12 of 12 from the free throw line. Gregg Popovich employed a strategy he learned from his good friend, Don Nelson, who drafted Dirk. He sent Erik Dampier to the line instead.
The hack-a-whoever strategy has worked before. The Spurs used it on Shaquille O'Neal in 2007 and Nellie's Mavs used it on Bruce Bowen in 2003, but sending Dampier to the line is the biggest mistake of Gregg Popovich's career for several reasons. Pop needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in The San Antonio Spurs can beat the Dallas Mavericks in this series if Gregg Popovich allows it. Dirk Nowitzki was unstoppable Sunday night because he matched 12 of 14 shooting from the floor with 12 of 12 from the free throw line. Gregg Popovich employed a strategy he learned from his good friend, Don Nelson, who drafted Dirk. He sent Erik Dampier to the line instead.
The hack-a-whoever strategy has worked before. The Spurs used it on Shaquille O'Neal in 2007 and Nellie's Mavs used it on Bruce Bowen in 2003, but sending Dampier to the line is the biggest mistake of Gregg Popovich's career for several reasons. Pop needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in The San Antonio Spurs can beat the Dallas Mavericks in this series if Gregg Popovich allows it. Dirk Nowitzki was unstoppable Sunday night because he matched 12 of 14 shooting from the floor with 12 of 12 from the free throw line. Gregg Popovich employed a strategy he learned from his good friend, Don Nelson, who drafted Dirk. He sent Erik Dampier to the line instead.
The hack-a-whoever strategy has worked before. The Spurs used it on Shaquille O'Neal in 2007 and Nellie's Mavs used it on Bruce Bowen in 2003, but sending Dampier to the line is the biggest mistake of Gregg Popovich's career for several reasons. Pop needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in Game 2.
Why? Dirk can't handle it, and the 2007 Golden State Warriors can tell you better than anyone.
Pop needs to face a fact: Dirk will go to the line. The fouls that send him there need to be physically and psychologically draining. In 2007, the first round was so punishing for No-Nutzki that he was afraid to take a shot by the end of a must-win game 6 in Oakland. In that game, the final game played in Dirk's MVP season, he was 2-13 from the floor, 0-6 from 3, 4-4 from the line, and finished with 8 points. Andris Biedrins, whose range is about 5 inches, finished with 12.
This isn't the first time in history that a German offense has looked unbreakable. Dirk has spent the past four years making the Spurs his Anne Frank. Even with Bowen, this team's only answer is to hide and hope someone else (like Golden State) offs the Mavs first.
Gregg Popovich knows his military history, and for the first time in his coaching career I think he knows it better than he knows basketball. Just as it did 60 years ago, the offensive has to start in France.
This decade, the Spurs drafted a teenager from France with more raw defensive potential than anyone else in his class. It's not future Laker's guard Tony Parker, kids - it's Ian Mahinmi. Early scouting reports highlighted Dennis Rodman defensive potential from the 17 year-old. Potential that could turn away Amare Stoudamire like the 20-20 line on an eye chart, and wrap up Dirk like an illegitimate child in a prostitute's womb.
I wish I knew why Pop doesn't trust Mahinmi, or why he thinks Ian's ankle injuries were his fault. It's not like he broke his elbow skiing with Vladimir Radmanovic. He was in the D-League trying to show Pop what he can do.
Pop needs to spend less time in the wine cellar and more in the library so he can see that Ian is the new Normandy. It's got to start with him. In fact, Popovich's most startling lineup change needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in Game 2.
Why? Dirk can't handle it, and the 2007 Golden State Warriors can tell you better than anyone.
Pop needs to face a fact: Dirk will go to the line. The fouls that send him there need to be physically and psychologically draining. In 2007, the first round was so punishing for No-Nutzki that he was afraid to take a shot by the end of a must-win game 6 in Oakland. In that game, the final game played in Dirk's MVP season, he was 2-13 from the floor, 0-6 from 3, 4-4 from the line, and finished with 8 points. Andris Biedrins, whose range is about 5 inches, finished with 12.
This isn't the first time in history that a German offense has looked unbreakable. Dirk has spent the past four years making the Spurs his Anne Frank. Even with Bowen, this team's only answer is to hide and hope someone else (like Golden State) offs the Mavs first.
Gregg Popovich knows his military history, and for the first time in his coaching career I think he knows it better than he knows basketball. Just as it did 60 years ago, the offensive has to start in France.
This decade, the Spurs drafted a teenager from France with more raw defensive potential than anyone else in his class. It's not future Laker's guard Tony Parker, kids - it's Ian Mahinmi. Early scouting reports highlighted Dennis Rodman defensive potential from the 17 year-old. Potential that could turn away Amare Stoudamire like the 20-20 line on an eye chart, and wrap up Dirk like an illegitimate child in a prostitute's womb.
I wish I knew why Pop doesn't trust Mahinmi, or why he thinks Ian's ankle injuries were his fault. It's not like he broke his elbow skiing with Vladimir Radmanovic. He was in the D-League trying to show Pop what he can do.
Pop needs to spend less time in the wine cellar and more in the library so he can see that Ian is the new Normandy. It's got to start with him. In fact, Popovich's most startling lineup change needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in The San Antonio Spurs can beat the Dallas Mavericks in this series if Gregg Popovich allows it. Dirk Nowitzki was unstoppable Sunday night because he matched 12 of 14 shooting from the floor with 12 of 12 from the free throw line. Gregg Popovich employed a strategy he learned from his good friend, Don Nelson, who drafted Dirk. He sent Erik Dampier to the line instead.
The hack-a-whoever strategy has worked before. The Spurs used it on Shaquille O'Neal in 2007 and Nellie's Mavs used it on Bruce Bowen in 2003, but sending Dampier to the line is the biggest mistake of Gregg Popovich's career for several reasons. Pop needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in Game 2.
Why? Dirk can't handle it, and the 2007 Golden State Warriors can tell you better than anyone.
Pop needs to face a fact: Dirk will go to the line. The fouls that send him there need to be physically and psychologically draining. In 2007, the first round was so punishing for No-Nutzki that he was afraid to take a shot by the end of a must-win game 6 in Oakland. In that game, the final game played in Dirk's MVP season, he was 2-13 from the floor, 0-6 from 3, 4-4 from the line, and finished with 8 points. Andris Biedrins, whose range is about 5 inches, finished with 12.
This isn't the first time in history that a German offense has looked unbreakable. Dirk has spent the past four years making the Spurs his Anne Frank. Even with Bowen, this team's only answer is to hide and hope someone else (like Golden State) offs the Mavs first.
Gregg Popovich knows his military history, and for the first time in his coaching career I think he knows it better than he knows basketball. Just as it did 60 years ago, the offensive has to start in France.
This decade, the Spurs drafted a teenager from France with more raw defensive potential than anyone else in his class. It's not future Laker's guard Tony Parker, kids - it's Ian Mahinmi. Early scouting reports highlighted Dennis Rodman defensive potential from the 17 year-old. Potential that could turn away Amare Stoudamire like the 20-20 line on an eye chart, and wrap up Dirk like an illegitimate child in a prostitute's womb.
I wish I knew why Pop doesn't trust Mahinmi, or why he thinks Ian's ankle injuries were his fault. It's not like he broke his elbow skiing with Vladimir Radmanovic. He was in the D-League trying to show Pop what he can do.
Pop needs to spend less time in the wine cellar and more in the library so he can see that Ian is the new Normandy. It's got to start with him. In fact, Popovich's most startling lineup change needs to use a different strategy that he can learn from Nelson also. The person San Antonio should intentionally foul is DIRK NOWITZKI. They should hack the shit out of him. Pop needs to put him on a chopping block and send him to the line 20 times in Game 2.
Why? Dirk can't handle it, and the 2007 Golden State Warriors can tell you better than anyone.
Pop needs to face a fact: Dirk will go to the line. The fouls that send him there need to be physically and psychologically draining. In 2007, the first round was so punishing for No-Nutzki that he was afraid to take a shot by the end of a must-win game 6 in Oakland. In that game, the final game played in Dirk's MVP season, he was 2-13 from the floor, 0-6 from 3, 4-4 from the line, and finished with 8 points. Andris Biedrins, whose range is about 5 inches, finished with 12.
This isn't the first time in history that a German offense has looked unbreakable. Dirk has spent the past four years making the Spurs his Anne Frank. Even with Bowen, this team's only answer is to hide and hope someone else (like Golden State) offs the Mavs first.
Gregg Popovich knows his military history, and for the first time in his coaching career I think he knows it better than he knows basketball. Just as it did 60 years ago, the offensive has to start in France.
This decade, the Spurs drafted a teenager from France with more raw defensive potential than anyone else in his class. It's not future Laker's guard Tony Parker, kids - it's Ian Mahinmi. Early scouting reports highlighted Dennis Rodman defensive potential from the 17 year-old. Potential that could turn away Amare Stoudamire like the 20-20 line on an eye chart, and wrap up Dirk like an illegitimate child in a prostitute's womb.
I wish I knew why Pop doesn't trust Mahinmi, or why he thinks Ian's ankle injuries were his fault. It's not like he broke his elbow skiing with Vladimir Radmanovic. He was in the D-League trying to show Pop what he can do.
Pop needs to spend less time in the wine cellar and more in the library so he can see that Ian is the new Normandy. It's got to start with him. In fact, Popovich's most startling lineup change ever would be starting Ian at center next to Duncan tonight. Tell him to go out and play Dirk as aggressively as possible until he has three fouls. After three fouls, take him out and go with Antonio McDyess. McDyess can guard Dirk, and we ahve seen him do it this year. He even played exceptional defense in Game 1... Dirk just happened to have almost every shot go in. As Duncan said, "I'll go ahead and bet" that won't happen again. Then do the same thing to start the second half. Let Ian foul out, but use his fouls as a weapon.
Erik Dampier already knows he can't handle pressure, but Dirk won't know that until we give him the physical ass kicking for which he is long over due. How unstoppable would Dirk look against Charles Barkley, Bill Laimbeer, or Dennis Rodman? After the first ticky-tack foul, Dirk would be in a breathless pile under the basket. If this Mavs team could play the Bad Boy Pistons, Laimbeer, Rodman, Salley, and Dumars would fight it out just to see who got to lay out Dirk first.
Dirk may even lash out and earn a suspension. Unfortunately, we'll never know because Ian won't see the floor. Our only hope now is that Keith Bogans does, and that Malik Hairston has a speedy recovery. As for Popovich, take a grenade to gunfight like the Warriors did. If Matt Barnes, Pietrus, and Baron Davis' right hamstring could stop Dirk then the Spurs can, too.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Monday, March 29, 2010
Puncher's Chance
In boxing, they say the last thing to leave a fighter is his punch. Last time he fought, Mike Tyson still had his punch, but that was all he had. As fans have seen in the last few weeks - the San Antonio Spurs can still throw a few punches, too.
Anyone reading this will plainly see that the date on my previous post was in November, and there's a reason why I haven't written about the Silver and Black for almost four and a half months. By San Antonio standards, this has been a piss-poor Spurs season. When the Spurs can't beat playoff teams, and they uncharacteristically get out-classed in the clutch moments they used to stamp with their logo, I really don't have much to say. However, as Tony Parker's hand broke, mine became more nimble. Parker's injury has given me a few things to mention.
The Express News reported last week that Gregg Popovich is satisfied with team chemistry after a long period of adjustment by new players and over twenty different starting lineups. The Spurs gutted out a tough win in Oklahoma City, defeated the Cavaliers by guarding Lebron James as well as any team has this year, and then turned in their best defensive performance of the year in Boston last night. Derek and I said on the show yesterday that the Celtics was the biggest road game of the season, and that we would know the Spurs could make a run based on how they performed last night.
The team responded in a fashion that gave me 1999 and 2005 flashbacks. When Manu's running 3 at the third quarter buzzer hit the glass and went in the net I remembered a stunned Phoenix crowd in '05 when Manu made the same shot and triggered a 42 point fourth quarter. As Kevin Garnett hit the ground I could almost see Larry Johnston falling to the Madison Square Garden hardwood as before. Above all, the Spurs defended like the Spurs. An incredibly talented Celtics team was was suffocated by a team defense the Spurs HAVE NOT PLAYED since 2007. The Celtics scored only 73 points on 37% shooting, and a team with Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, and now Michael Finley shot only 7.1% from 3 point range. This is the kind of defense the Spurs have used to win championships, and they played it with an intensity like they were literally fighting for their lives.
Why now are the Spurs more focused, more defensive, more passionate, and led by an Argentinian shooting guard who is playing like Michael Jordan? Why is the team chemistry finally jelling and why is Richard Jefferson starting to look like a success? Simple: Tony Parker has not played a game in the last three weeks. Players are getting involved to the point that Pop's plan to rest Tim Duncan is coming to fruition. Duncan played only 26 minutes in Boston, and sat out most of the 4th quarter against the Cavs - and the Spurs won both games. This was the plan back in October, but it took a little longer.
When Tony Parker scores 27 ppg other players don't get in rhythm. Richard Jefferson said it best: He needs to play with Ginobili; when they're on the court together he plays better. Ginobili has averaged 27 points and 6 assists over the last two weeks and the Spurs are finally playing how we thought they would, but they WILL NOT win a title.
If Tony Parker is ready to play in the first round, then Pop will go with him just as an in-form Rafer Alston was cast aside by the Magic at the wrong time last year for Jameer Nelson's comeback. The right thing to do is bring Tony off the bench, but Pop won't do it. Parker's game is suited for the bench because he can score in bunches and hat this level a player does not have to start to be effective. Ginobili has been juggled out of the starting five since 2004 to ease the delicate sensibilities of Hedo Turkoglu, Brent Barry, and Michael Finley; and he will now have to indulge Tony Parker.
Manu Ginobili is the Spurs' MVP this year. For the first time since 2005, he is averaging better numbers after the All-Star break than before, but not starting Parker will be admitting defeat for Popovich. If Pop can admit his experiment failed and stop coddling a selfish, ego maniacal, Belgian, future Laker who has been playing the wrong position since he arrived in our great country - the Spurs have a shot.
However, he will still go with Parker because he knows Manu is a competitor. Ginobili doesn't care about starting because he's worried about finishing. The difference between arrogance and confidence is equal to the difference between Tony and Manu. Hopefully Pop will see the difference before he sees Parker wearing purple. Ginobili still has that punch; it's only a question of whether or not Pop lets him use it.
Anyone reading this will plainly see that the date on my previous post was in November, and there's a reason why I haven't written about the Silver and Black for almost four and a half months. By San Antonio standards, this has been a piss-poor Spurs season. When the Spurs can't beat playoff teams, and they uncharacteristically get out-classed in the clutch moments they used to stamp with their logo, I really don't have much to say. However, as Tony Parker's hand broke, mine became more nimble. Parker's injury has given me a few things to mention.
The Express News reported last week that Gregg Popovich is satisfied with team chemistry after a long period of adjustment by new players and over twenty different starting lineups. The Spurs gutted out a tough win in Oklahoma City, defeated the Cavaliers by guarding Lebron James as well as any team has this year, and then turned in their best defensive performance of the year in Boston last night. Derek and I said on the show yesterday that the Celtics was the biggest road game of the season, and that we would know the Spurs could make a run based on how they performed last night.
The team responded in a fashion that gave me 1999 and 2005 flashbacks. When Manu's running 3 at the third quarter buzzer hit the glass and went in the net I remembered a stunned Phoenix crowd in '05 when Manu made the same shot and triggered a 42 point fourth quarter. As Kevin Garnett hit the ground I could almost see Larry Johnston falling to the Madison Square Garden hardwood as before. Above all, the Spurs defended like the Spurs. An incredibly talented Celtics team was was suffocated by a team defense the Spurs HAVE NOT PLAYED since 2007. The Celtics scored only 73 points on 37% shooting, and a team with Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, and now Michael Finley shot only 7.1% from 3 point range. This is the kind of defense the Spurs have used to win championships, and they played it with an intensity like they were literally fighting for their lives.
Why now are the Spurs more focused, more defensive, more passionate, and led by an Argentinian shooting guard who is playing like Michael Jordan? Why is the team chemistry finally jelling and why is Richard Jefferson starting to look like a success? Simple: Tony Parker has not played a game in the last three weeks. Players are getting involved to the point that Pop's plan to rest Tim Duncan is coming to fruition. Duncan played only 26 minutes in Boston, and sat out most of the 4th quarter against the Cavs - and the Spurs won both games. This was the plan back in October, but it took a little longer.
When Tony Parker scores 27 ppg other players don't get in rhythm. Richard Jefferson said it best: He needs to play with Ginobili; when they're on the court together he plays better. Ginobili has averaged 27 points and 6 assists over the last two weeks and the Spurs are finally playing how we thought they would, but they WILL NOT win a title.
If Tony Parker is ready to play in the first round, then Pop will go with him just as an in-form Rafer Alston was cast aside by the Magic at the wrong time last year for Jameer Nelson's comeback. The right thing to do is bring Tony off the bench, but Pop won't do it. Parker's game is suited for the bench because he can score in bunches and hat this level a player does not have to start to be effective. Ginobili has been juggled out of the starting five since 2004 to ease the delicate sensibilities of Hedo Turkoglu, Brent Barry, and Michael Finley; and he will now have to indulge Tony Parker.
Manu Ginobili is the Spurs' MVP this year. For the first time since 2005, he is averaging better numbers after the All-Star break than before, but not starting Parker will be admitting defeat for Popovich. If Pop can admit his experiment failed and stop coddling a selfish, ego maniacal, Belgian, future Laker who has been playing the wrong position since he arrived in our great country - the Spurs have a shot.
However, he will still go with Parker because he knows Manu is a competitor. Ginobili doesn't care about starting because he's worried about finishing. The difference between arrogance and confidence is equal to the difference between Tony and Manu. Hopefully Pop will see the difference before he sees Parker wearing purple. Ginobili still has that punch; it's only a question of whether or not Pop lets him use it.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Center of Attention
San Antonio Spurs fans are naturally some of the most discriminating in the league when it comes to expecting a certain level of play from the "5," after watching a specimen like David Robinson for 13 years. Robinson could do it all, and that includes being able to guard The Big Charlatan better than anyone ever has. I could use literally all of the space in which I am allowed to type to list The Admiral's achievements, accolades, awards and honors. Instead, I will simply quote Charles Barkley - "David Robinson (is) the most athletic center, EVER."
According to Hoopedia: "The center is relied upon at both ends of the floor. On offense, the center must be able to score inside (close to the basket), while on defense, he must block shots and rebound" (http://hoopedia.nba.com/index.php?title=Center). Since Mr. Robinson retired in 2003, the Spurs have definitely had players who met this description.
In 2005, the Playoff rotation of Tim Duncan, Nazr Mohammed, and Robert Horry was the best to take the floor since the Twin Towers patrolled the paint together, but Robert Horry spoiled the Spurs and their fans just as much as Robinson had. San Antonio had now seen a center who could hit threes, especially clutch ones, rebound, block shots, draw charges, and get steals - and do so with an uncanny sense of timing that heralds comparisons to Jordan and Bird. Following 2005, Francisco Elson, Fabricio Oberto, and Kurt Thomas were fine players, but didn't seem to have any specialties.
Enter: Matt Bonner. With Horry slowly exiting the rotation and then the league, Bonner seemed like a logical step. He was the lesser of a few evils. None of the Spurs "big men" played the role of a traditional center, but Bonner's advantage was his three point shot. Maybe he could become the next Horry.... The problem, however, is that Bonner can be effective ONLY when shooting 3's, and, faced with no other options, Gregg Popovich told him that doing so was the only way to ensure playing time.
You've seen the first few games of the season, but think about them as you read the definition of a center again. Does Bonner do any of that consistently? The answer is no. Guards and Forwards are supposed to hit outside shots - and we have players who can. With Manu, RJ, Fin, Mason, and Hill we have three point shooters. Centers are supposed to rebound, block, and get put-backs, and the Spurs aren't short in that department either. Blair, McDyess, and Ratliff are all KICK ASS interior players, but one of them will see very few minutes because Bonner is INEFFECTIVE unless he starts, plays with Parker on the floor, and shoots a lot of 3's.
ANY of the Spurs big men should start, and play, instead of Bonner. McDyess can stretch the floor just enough for Duncan with his midrange game, Blair just tramples people to get rebounds, and if Theo Ratliff and Tim Duncan played together enough to develop good timing, they would block shots like David and Tim did in 1999 and 2003. What will the Spurs miss if Bonner is not on the floor? Nothing. By starting Bonner, Popovich is sacrificing defense for offense when he doesn't even have to, and we all know he is smart enough to know it. For the Spurs to return to the suffocating levels of defense with which they won championships, Bonner will have to go sit in his "Wicked Awesome Section" of the bench, and let the MEN play basketball. Somewhere, some day, there may be another Robert Horry, but it's not Matt Bonner. Not now.
According to Hoopedia: "The center is relied upon at both ends of the floor. On offense, the center must be able to score inside (close to the basket), while on defense, he must block shots and rebound" (http://hoopedia.nba.com/index.php?title=Center). Since Mr. Robinson retired in 2003, the Spurs have definitely had players who met this description.
In 2005, the Playoff rotation of Tim Duncan, Nazr Mohammed, and Robert Horry was the best to take the floor since the Twin Towers patrolled the paint together, but Robert Horry spoiled the Spurs and their fans just as much as Robinson had. San Antonio had now seen a center who could hit threes, especially clutch ones, rebound, block shots, draw charges, and get steals - and do so with an uncanny sense of timing that heralds comparisons to Jordan and Bird. Following 2005, Francisco Elson, Fabricio Oberto, and Kurt Thomas were fine players, but didn't seem to have any specialties.
Enter: Matt Bonner. With Horry slowly exiting the rotation and then the league, Bonner seemed like a logical step. He was the lesser of a few evils. None of the Spurs "big men" played the role of a traditional center, but Bonner's advantage was his three point shot. Maybe he could become the next Horry.... The problem, however, is that Bonner can be effective ONLY when shooting 3's, and, faced with no other options, Gregg Popovich told him that doing so was the only way to ensure playing time.
You've seen the first few games of the season, but think about them as you read the definition of a center again. Does Bonner do any of that consistently? The answer is no. Guards and Forwards are supposed to hit outside shots - and we have players who can. With Manu, RJ, Fin, Mason, and Hill we have three point shooters. Centers are supposed to rebound, block, and get put-backs, and the Spurs aren't short in that department either. Blair, McDyess, and Ratliff are all KICK ASS interior players, but one of them will see very few minutes because Bonner is INEFFECTIVE unless he starts, plays with Parker on the floor, and shoots a lot of 3's.
ANY of the Spurs big men should start, and play, instead of Bonner. McDyess can stretch the floor just enough for Duncan with his midrange game, Blair just tramples people to get rebounds, and if Theo Ratliff and Tim Duncan played together enough to develop good timing, they would block shots like David and Tim did in 1999 and 2003. What will the Spurs miss if Bonner is not on the floor? Nothing. By starting Bonner, Popovich is sacrificing defense for offense when he doesn't even have to, and we all know he is smart enough to know it. For the Spurs to return to the suffocating levels of defense with which they won championships, Bonner will have to go sit in his "Wicked Awesome Section" of the bench, and let the MEN play basketball. Somewhere, some day, there may be another Robert Horry, but it's not Matt Bonner. Not now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
